Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

M

Mistral Medium 3.5

Mistral AI
$1.50 / $7.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
N

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

NVIDIA
$0.20 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
M
N
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 15.0× cheaper than Mistral Medium 3.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Mistral Medium 3.5 has the larger context window (262K vs 131K).
Mistral Medium 3.5Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety
Input price / 1M$1.50$0.20
Output price / 1M$7.50$0.20
Blended price (3:1)$3.00$0.20
Cached input / 1M
Context window262K131K
Max output210K118K
Intelligence index14.2
Coding index46.9
Providers21
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-04-302026-06-04
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Mistral Medium 3.5 or Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety?

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 15.0× cheaper than Mistral Medium 3.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: which has a bigger context window?

Mistral Medium 3.5: 262,144 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Mistral Medium 3.5 ≈ $6,750, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety ≈ $500.00.

More comparisons