GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Mistral Medium 3.5

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Z

GLM 5.3 FlashX

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.37 / $1.25
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
M

Mistral Medium 3.5

Mistral AI
$1.50 / $7.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Z
M
Verdict: GLM 5.3 FlashX is 5.1× cheaper than Mistral Medium 3.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 FlashX has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
GLM 5.3 FlashXMistral Medium 3.5
Input price / 1M$0.37$1.50
Output price / 1M$1.25$7.50
Blended price (3:1)$0.59$3.00
Cached input / 1M$0.09
Context window1M262K
Max output131K210K
Intelligence index14.2
Coding index46.9
Providers12
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-182026-04-30
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 FlashX or Mistral Medium 3.5?

GLM 5.3 FlashX is 5.1× cheaper than Mistral Medium 3.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Mistral Medium 3.5: which has a bigger context window?

GLM 5.3 FlashX: 1,048,576 tokens. Mistral Medium 3.5: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 FlashX ≈ $1,365, Mistral Medium 3.5 ≈ $6,750.

More comparisons