Ministral 3 14B 2512 vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

M

Ministral 3 14B 2512

Mistral AI
$0.20 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
N

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

NVIDIA
$0.20 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
M
N
Verdict: Ministral 3 14B 2512 has the larger context window (262K vs 131K).
Ministral 3 14B 2512Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety
Input price / 1M$0.20$0.20
Output price / 1M$0.20$0.20
Blended price (3:1)$0.20$0.20
Cached input / 1M$0.02
Context window262K131K
Max output210K118K
Intelligence index6
Coding index14.4
Providers31
Best provider uptime (30m)99.7%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingYesNo
Released2025-12-022026-06-04
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Ministral 3 14B 2512 or Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety?

Ministral 3 14B 2512 and Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety are priced identically.

Ministral 3 14B 2512 vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: which has a bigger context window?

Ministral 3 14B 2512: 262,144 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Ministral 3 14B 2512 ≈ $500.00, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety ≈ $500.00.

More comparisons