GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Ministral 3 14B 2512

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Z

GLM 5.3 FlashX

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.37 / $1.25
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
M

Ministral 3 14B 2512

Mistral AI
$0.20 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Z
M
Verdict: Ministral 3 14B 2512 is 2.9× cheaper than GLM 5.3 FlashX on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 FlashX has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
GLM 5.3 FlashXMinistral 3 14B 2512
Input price / 1M$0.37$0.20
Output price / 1M$1.25$0.20
Blended price (3:1)$0.59$0.20
Cached input / 1M$0.09$0.02
Context window1M262K
Max output131K210K
Intelligence index6
Coding index14.4
Providers13
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%99.7%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-182025-12-02
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 FlashX or Ministral 3 14B 2512?

Ministral 3 14B 2512 is 2.9× cheaper than GLM 5.3 FlashX on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Ministral 3 14B 2512: which has a bigger context window?

GLM 5.3 FlashX: 1,048,576 tokens. Ministral 3 14B 2512: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 FlashX ≈ $1,365, Ministral 3 14B 2512 ≈ $500.00.

More comparisons