MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Weaver (alpha)

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

MiniMax

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

MiniMax
$0.15 / $0.60
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
M

Weaver (alpha)

Mancer
$0.30 / $0.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
MiniMax
M
Verdict: MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 25% cheaper than Weaver (alpha) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiniMax M3.1 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 8K).
MiniMax M3.1 FlashWeaver (alpha)
Input price / 1M$0.15$0.30
Output price / 1M$0.60$0.50
Blended price (3:1)$0.26$0.35
Cached input / 1M$0.015$0.30
Context window1M8K
Max output524K6K
Intelligence index29.1—
Coding index——
Providers11—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-10-192023-08-02
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M3.1 Flash or Weaver (alpha)?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 25% cheaper than Weaver (alpha) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Weaver (alpha): which has a bigger context window?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Weaver (alpha): 8,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiniMax M3.1 Flash ≈ $600.00, Weaver (alpha) ≈ $850.00.

More comparisons