MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Schematron V2 Turbo

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

MiniMax

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

MiniMax
$0.15 / $0.60
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Inference Net

Schematron V2 Turbo

Inference Net
$0.03 / $0.15
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
MiniMax
Inference Net
Verdict: Schematron V2 Turbo is 4.4× cheaper than MiniMax M3.1 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiniMax M3.1 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 128K).
MiniMax M3.1 FlashSchematron V2 Turbo
Input price / 1M$0.15$0.03
Output price / 1M$0.60$0.15
Blended price (3:1)$0.26$0.06
Cached input / 1M$0.015$0.03
Context window1M128K
Max output524K8K
Intelligence index29.1—
Coding index——
Providers11—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-10-192026-09-12
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M3.1 Flash or Schematron V2 Turbo?

Schematron V2 Turbo is 4.4× cheaper than MiniMax M3.1 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Schematron V2 Turbo: which has a bigger context window?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Schematron V2 Turbo: 128,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiniMax M3.1 Flash ≈ $600.00, Schematron V2 Turbo ≈ $135.00.

More comparisons