Claude Fable 5.2 vs Schematron V2 Turbo

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Fable 5.2

Anthropic
$8.00 / $40.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Inference Net

Schematron V2 Turbo

Inference Net
$0.03 / $0.15
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
Inference Net
Verdict: Schematron V2 Turbo is 266.7× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Fable 5.2 has the larger context window (1M vs 128K).
Claude Fable 5.2Schematron V2 Turbo
Input price / 1M$8.00$0.03
Output price / 1M$40.00$0.15
Blended price (3:1)$16.00$0.06
Cached input / 1M$0.20$0.03
Context window1M128K
Max output128K8K
Intelligence index64.6—
Coding index——
Providers5—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-11-072026-09-12
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.2 or Schematron V2 Turbo?

Schematron V2 Turbo is 266.7× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Fable 5.2 vs Schematron V2 Turbo: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Fable 5.2: 1,000,000 tokens. Schematron V2 Turbo: 128,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Fable 5.2 ≈ $36,000, Schematron V2 Turbo ≈ $135.00.

More comparisons