MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

MiniMax

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

MiniMax
$0.15 / $0.60
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3.6 Max Preview

Qwen (Alibaba)
$1.03 / $6.16
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
MiniMax
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 8.8× cheaper than Qwen3.6 Max Preview on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiniMax M3.1 Flash scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (29.1 vs 28.4). MiniMax M3.1 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
MiniMax M3.1 FlashQwen3.6 Max Preview
Input price / 1M$0.15$1.03
Output price / 1M$0.60$6.16
Blended price (3:1)$0.26$2.31
Cached input / 1M$0.015—
Context window1M262K
Max output524K66K
Intelligence index29.128.4
Coding index——
Providers11—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-192026-04-27
Retirement—2026-10-09

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M3.1 Flash or Qwen3.6 Max Preview?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 8.8× cheaper than Qwen3.6 Max Preview on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview: which has a bigger context window?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiniMax M3.1 Flash ≈ $600.00, Qwen3.6 Max Preview ≈ $5,135.

More comparisons