MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

MiniMax

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

MiniMax
$0.15 / $0.60
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.10 / $0.42
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
MiniMax
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is 31% cheaper than MiniMax M3.1 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiniMax M3.1 Flash scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (29.1 vs 11.9). MiniMax M3.1 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
MiniMax M3.1 FlashQwen3 VL 32B Instruct
Input price / 1M$0.15$0.10
Output price / 1M$0.60$0.42
Blended price (3:1)$0.26$0.18
Cached input / 1M$0.015—
Context window1M131K
Max output524K33K
Intelligence index29.111.9
Coding index——
Providers11—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-192025-10-23
Retirement—2026-10-09

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M3.1 Flash or Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct?

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is 31% cheaper than MiniMax M3.1 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct: which has a bigger context window?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiniMax M3.1 Flash ≈ $600.00, Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct ≈ $416.00.

More comparisons