Gemini 4 Carbon vs Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Google

Gemini 4 Carbon

Google
$2.00 / $10.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.10 / $0.42
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Google
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is 22.0× cheaper than Gemini 4 Carbon on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Gemini 4 Carbon scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (60 vs 11.9). Gemini 4 Carbon has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
Gemini 4 CarbonQwen3 VL 32B Instruct
Input price / 1M$2.00$0.10
Output price / 1M$10.00$0.42
Blended price (3:1)$4.00$0.18
Cached input / 1M$0.10—
Context window1M131K
Max output944K33K
Intelligence index6011.9
Coding index——
Providers7—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-11-102025-10-23
Retirement—2026-10-09

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Gemini 4 Carbon or Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct?

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is 22.0× cheaper than Gemini 4 Carbon on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Gemini 4 Carbon vs Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct: which has a bigger context window?

Gemini 4 Carbon: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Gemini 4 Carbon ≈ $9,000, Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct ≈ $416.00.

More comparisons