MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

MiniMax

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

MiniMax
$0.15 / $0.60
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.15 / $0.60
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
MiniMax
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: MiniMax M3.1 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
MiniMax M3.1 FlashQwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
Input price / 1M$0.15$0.15
Output price / 1M$0.60$0.60
Blended price (3:1)$0.26$0.26
Cached input / 1M$0.015—
Context window1M262K
Max output524K16K
Intelligence index29.1—
Coding index——
Providers11—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-192025-10-06
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M3.1 Flash or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct are priced identically.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct: which has a bigger context window?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiniMax M3.1 Flash ≈ $600.00, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct ≈ $600.00.

More comparisons