GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Z.ai (Zhipu)

GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.37 / $1.25
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.15 / $0.60
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Z.ai (Zhipu)
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is 2.2× cheaper than GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalQwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
Input price / 1M$0.37$0.15
Output price / 1M$1.25$0.60
Blended price (3:1)$0.59$0.26
Cached input / 1M$0.075—
Context window1M262K
Max output131K16K
Intelligence index——
Coding index——
Providers1—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-11-022025-10-06
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is 2.2× cheaper than GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct: which has a bigger context window?

GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal ≈ $1,365, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct ≈ $600.00.

More comparisons