MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

MiniMax

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

MiniMax
$0.15 / $0.60
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.15 / $1.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
MiniMax
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 36% cheaper than Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiniMax M3.1 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
MiniMax M3.1 FlashQwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Input price / 1M$0.15$0.15
Output price / 1M$0.60$1.20
Blended price (3:1)$0.26$0.41
Cached input / 1M$0.015—
Context window1M262K
Max output524K236K
Intelligence index29.1—
Coding index—17.4
Providers11—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-192025-09-11
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M3.1 Flash or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 36% cheaper than Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking: which has a bigger context window?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiniMax M3.1 Flash ≈ $600.00, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking ≈ $900.00.

More comparisons