MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Qwen3 14B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

MiniMax

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

MiniMax
$0.15 / $0.60
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3 14B

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.10 / $0.22
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
MiniMax
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: Qwen3 14B is 2.0× cheaper than MiniMax M3.1 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiniMax M3.1 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 41K).
MiniMax M3.1 FlashQwen3 14B
Input price / 1M$0.15$0.10
Output price / 1M$0.60$0.22
Blended price (3:1)$0.26$0.13
Cached input / 1M$0.015—
Context window1M41K
Max output524K37K
Intelligence index29.1—
Coding index—13.8
Providers11—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-192025-04-28
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M3.1 Flash or Qwen3 14B?

Qwen3 14B is 2.0× cheaper than MiniMax M3.1 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Qwen3 14B: which has a bigger context window?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3 14B: 40,960 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiniMax M3.1 Flash ≈ $600.00, Qwen3 14B ≈ $310.00.

More comparisons