MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

MiniMax

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

MiniMax
$0.15 / $0.60
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.36 / $0.40
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
MiniMax
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 29% cheaper than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiniMax M3.1 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 33K).
MiniMax M3.1 FlashQwen2.5 72B Instruct
Input price / 1M$0.15$0.36
Output price / 1M$0.60$0.40
Blended price (3:1)$0.26$0.37
Cached input / 1M$0.015—
Context window1M33K
Max output524K16K
Intelligence index29.1—
Coding index——
Providers11—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-192024-09-19
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M3.1 Flash or Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 29% cheaper than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: which has a bigger context window?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 32,768 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiniMax M3.1 Flash ≈ $600.00, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct ≈ $920.00.

More comparisons