MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Pareto
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 14.3× cheaper than Pareto on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiniMax M3.1 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
| MiniMax M3.1 Flash | Pareto | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.15 | $2.50 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.60 | $7.50 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.26 | $3.75 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.015 | $0.25 |
| Context window | 1M | 262K |
| Max output | 524K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | 29.1 | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | 11 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-10-19 | 2026-09-17 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, MiniMax M3.1 Flash or Pareto?
MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 14.3× cheaper than Pareto on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Pareto: which has a bigger context window?
MiniMax M3.1 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Pareto: 262,144 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiniMax M3.1 Flash ≈ $600.00, Pareto ≈ $8,750.
More comparisons
MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Gemini 4 CarbonMiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Claude Fable 5.2MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashMiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashMiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Hy4MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalMiniMax M3.1 Flash vs GPT-6.1 TerraMiniMax M3.1 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProMiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Kimi K3.1 ProMiniMax M3.1 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLMiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Gemini 4 ArgonMiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Claude Haiku 5.5MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Nano Banana 2.1MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Mistral Large 4MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProPareto vs Gemini 4 CarbonPareto vs Claude Fable 5.2Pareto vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashPareto vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashPareto vs Hy4Pareto vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalPareto vs GPT-6.1 TerraPareto vs GPT-6.1 Terra Pro