MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

MiniMax

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

MiniMax
$0.15 / $0.60
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
NVIDIA

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

NVIDIA
$0.20 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
MiniMax
NVIDIA
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 24% cheaper than MiniMax M3.1 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiniMax M3.1 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
MiniMax M3.1 FlashNemotron 3.5 Content Safety
Input price / 1M$0.15$0.20
Output price / 1M$0.60$0.20
Blended price (3:1)$0.26$0.20
Cached input / 1M$0.015—
Context window1M131K
Max output524K118K
Intelligence index29.1—
Coding index——
Providers111
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-10-192026-06-04
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M3.1 Flash or Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety?

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 24% cheaper than MiniMax M3.1 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: which has a bigger context window?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiniMax M3.1 Flash ≈ $600.00, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety ≈ $500.00.

More comparisons