MiniMax M2.7 vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

M

MiniMax M2.7

MiniMax
$0.30 / $1.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
N

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

NVIDIA
$0.20 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
M
N
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 2.6× cheaper than MiniMax M2.7 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiniMax M2.7 has the larger context window (205K vs 131K).
MiniMax M2.7Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety
Input price / 1M$0.30$0.20
Output price / 1M$1.20$0.20
Blended price (3:1)$0.52$0.20
Cached input / 1M$0.06
Context window205K131K
Max output131K118K
Intelligence index22.8
Coding index52.6
Providers91
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputNoYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-03-182026-06-04
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M2.7 or Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety?

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 2.6× cheaper than MiniMax M2.7 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiniMax M2.7 vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: which has a bigger context window?

MiniMax M2.7: 204,800 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiniMax M2.7 ≈ $1,200, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety ≈ $500.00.

More comparisons