MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.6 27B
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 5.2× cheaper than Qwen3.6 27B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
| MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen3.6 27B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.14 | $0.32 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.28 | $2.70 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.18 | $0.92 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.0028 | $0.15 |
| Context window | 1M | 262K |
| Max output | 131K | 262K |
| Intelligence index | — | 21.4 |
| Coding index | — | 53.7 |
| Providers | 2 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 99.9% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-09-21 | 2026-04-27 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Qwen3.6 27B?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 5.2× cheaper than Qwen3.6 27B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.6 27B: which has a bigger context window?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3.6 27B: 262,144 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00, Qwen3.6 27B ≈ $1,990.
More comparisons
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Command A+MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 LunaMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 SolMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Grok 4.7MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashXMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 AstraMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Astra ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Qwen3.6 27B vs GLM 5.3 PrimeQwen3.6 27B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeQwen3.6 27B vs Command A+Qwen3.6 27B vs GPT-6 Luna ProQwen3.6 27B vs GPT-6 LunaQwen3.6 27B vs GPT-6 Sol ProQwen3.6 27B vs GPT-6 SolQwen3.6 27B vs Claude Opus 5.5