Llama Guard 4 12B vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Meta Llama

Llama Guard 4 12B

Meta Llama
$0.18 / $0.18
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3.6 35B A3B

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.10 / $0.90
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Meta Llama
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: Llama Guard 4 12B is 40% cheaper than Qwen3.6 35B A3B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.6 35B A3B has the larger context window (262K vs 164K).
Llama Guard 4 12BQwen3.6 35B A3B
Input price / 1M$0.18$0.10
Output price / 1M$0.18$0.90
Blended price (3:1)$0.18$0.30
Cached input / 1M—$0.025
Context window164K262K
Max output16K236K
Intelligence index——
Coding index—41.9
Providers3—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingNoYes
Released2025-04-302026-04-27
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Llama Guard 4 12B or Qwen3.6 35B A3B?

Llama Guard 4 12B is 40% cheaper than Qwen3.6 35B A3B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Llama Guard 4 12B vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B: which has a bigger context window?

Llama Guard 4 12B: 163,840 tokens. Qwen3.6 35B A3B: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Llama Guard 4 12B ≈ $450.00, Qwen3.6 35B A3B ≈ $650.00.

More comparisons