Llama 3.1 8B Instruct vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Meta Llama

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Meta Llama
$0.02 / $0.04
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.20 / $2.40
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Meta Llama
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is 30.0× cheaper than Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has the larger context window (131K vs 82K).
Llama 3.1 8B InstructQwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Input price / 1M$0.02$0.20
Output price / 1M$0.04$2.40
Blended price (3:1)$0.025$0.75
Cached input / 1M——
Context window131K82K
Max output16K33K
Intelligence index—9.8
Coding index5.412.1
Providers——
Best provider uptime (30m)——
Vision inputNoNo
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2024-07-232025-08-28
Retirement—2026-10-09

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct or Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507?

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is 30.0× cheaper than Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: which has a bigger context window?

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct: 131,072 tokens. Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: 81,920 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Llama 3.1 8B Instruct ≈ $60.00, Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 ≈ $1,600.

More comparisons