Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Poolside

Laguna S 2.1

Poolside
$0.09 / $0.18
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
NVIDIA

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning

NVIDIA
$0.08 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Poolside
NVIDIA
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is 2% cheaper than Laguna S 2.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Laguna S 2.1 has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
Laguna S 2.1Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
Input price / 1M$0.09$0.08
Output price / 1M$0.18$0.20
Blended price (3:1)$0.11$0.11
Cached input / 1M$0.009$0.04
Context window1M262K
Max output131K131K
Intelligence index12.9
Coding index26.8
Providers4
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputNoNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-07-212026-08-11
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Laguna S 2.1 or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is 2% cheaper than Laguna S 2.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: which has a bigger context window?

Laguna S 2.1: 1,048,576 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Laguna S 2.1 ≈ $270.00, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning ≈ $260.00.

More comparisons