Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max Prime
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Laguna S 2.1 is 53.3× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max Prime on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Laguna S 2.1 has the larger context window (1M vs 1M).
| Laguna S 2.1 | Qwen3.8 Max Prime | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.09 | $4.00 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.18 | $12.00 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.11 | $6.00 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.009 | $0.50 |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | 131K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | — | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-07-21 | 2026-09-23 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Laguna S 2.1 or Qwen3.8 Max Prime?
Laguna S 2.1 is 53.3× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max Prime on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max Prime: which has a bigger context window?
Laguna S 2.1: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3.8 Max Prime: 1,000,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Laguna S 2.1 ≈ $270.00, Qwen3.8 Max Prime ≈ $14,000.
More comparisons
Laguna S 2.1 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLaguna S 2.1 vs Command A+Laguna S 2.1 vs GPT-6 Luna ProLaguna S 2.1 vs GPT-6 LunaLaguna S 2.1 vs GPT-6 Sol ProLaguna S 2.1 vs GPT-6 SolLaguna S 2.1 vs Claude Opus 5.5Laguna S 2.1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedLaguna S 2.1 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashLaguna S 2.1 vs Grok 4.7Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashLaguna S 2.1 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXLaguna S 2.1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashLaguna S 2.1 vs GPT-6 AstraLaguna S 2.1 vs GPT-6 Astra ProLaguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Qwen3.8 Max Prime vs GLM 5.3 PrimeQwen3.8 Max Prime vs Command A+Qwen3.8 Max Prime vs GPT-6 Luna ProQwen3.8 Max Prime vs GPT-6 LunaQwen3.8 Max Prime vs GPT-6 Sol ProQwen3.8 Max Prime vs GPT-6 SolQwen3.8 Max Prime vs Claude Opus 5.5Qwen3.8 Max Prime vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed