Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Moonshot AI

Kimi K3.1 Pro

Moonshot AI
$2.00 / $10.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.20 / $2.40
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Moonshot AI
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is 5.3× cheaper than Kimi K3.1 Pro on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Kimi K3.1 Pro scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (46.5 vs 9.8). Kimi K3.1 Pro has the larger context window (1M vs 82K).
Kimi K3.1 ProQwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Input price / 1M$2.00$0.20
Output price / 1M$10.00$2.40
Blended price (3:1)$4.00$0.75
Cached input / 1M$0.20—
Context window1M82K
Max output944K33K
Intelligence index46.59.8
Coding index—12.1
Providers23—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-232025-08-28
Retirement—2026-10-09

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Kimi K3.1 Pro or Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507?

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is 5.3× cheaper than Kimi K3.1 Pro on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: which has a bigger context window?

Kimi K3.1 Pro: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: 81,920 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Kimi K3.1 Pro ≈ $9,000, Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 ≈ $1,600.

More comparisons