Kimi K3 vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 30.0× cheaper than Kimi K3 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Kimi K3 has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
| Kimi K3 | Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $3.00 | $0.20 |
| Output price / 1M | $15.00 | $0.20 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $6.00 | $0.20 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.30 | — |
| Context window | 1M | 131K |
| Max output | 944K | 118K |
| Intelligence index | 43.6 | — |
| Coding index | 76.2 | — |
| Providers | 20 | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | No |
| Released | 2026-07-16 | 2026-06-04 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Kimi K3 or Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety?
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 30.0× cheaper than Kimi K3 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Kimi K3 vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: which has a bigger context window?
Kimi K3: 1,048,576 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: 131,072 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Kimi K3 ≈ $13,500, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety ≈ $500.00.
More comparisons
Kimi K3 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeKimi K3 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeKimi K3 vs Command A+Kimi K3 vs GPT-6 Luna ProKimi K3 vs GPT-6 LunaKimi K3 vs GPT-6 Sol ProKimi K3 vs GPT-6 SolKimi K3 vs Claude Opus 5.5Kimi K3 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedKimi K3 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashKimi K3 vs Grok 4.7Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashKimi K3 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXKimi K3 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashKimi K3 vs GPT-6 AstraKimi K3 vs GPT-6 Astra ProNemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs GLM 5.3 PrimeNemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeNemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs Command A+Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs GPT-6 Luna ProNemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs GPT-6 LunaNemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs GPT-6 Sol ProNemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs GPT-6 SolNemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs Claude Opus 5.5