Kimi K2.7 Code vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

M

Kimi K2.7 Code

Moonshot AI
$0.71 / $3.30
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
I

Ling 3.0 Flash VL

inclusionAI
$0.06 / $0.18
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
M
I
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 15.1× cheaper than Kimi K2.7 Code on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (25.8 vs 24.6).
Kimi K2.7 CodeLing 3.0 Flash VL
Input price / 1M$0.71$0.06
Output price / 1M$3.30$0.18
Blended price (3:1)$1.35$0.09
Cached input / 1M$0.18$0.012
Context window262K262K
Max output236K33K
Intelligence index25.824.6
Coding index60.857
Providers15
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-06-122026-09-10
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.7 Code or Ling 3.0 Flash VL?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 15.1× cheaper than Kimi K2.7 Code on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Kimi K2.7 Code vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL: which has a bigger context window?

Kimi K2.7 Code: 262,144 tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash VL: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Kimi K2.7 Code ≈ $3,062, Ling 3.0 Flash VL ≈ $210.00.

More comparisons