Kimi K2.6 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

M

Kimi K2.6

Moonshot AI
$0.95 / $4.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
N

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning

NVIDIA
$0.08 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
M
N
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is 15.6× cheaper than Kimi K2.6 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Kimi K2.6 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (27 vs 12.9).
Kimi K2.6Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
Input price / 1M$0.95$0.08
Output price / 1M$4.00$0.20
Blended price (3:1)$1.71$0.11
Cached input / 1M$0.16$0.04
Context window262K262K
Max output236K131K
Intelligence index2712.9
Coding index61.826.8
Providers224
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-04-202026-08-11
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.6 or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is 15.6× cheaper than Kimi K2.6 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Kimi K2.6 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: which has a bigger context window?

Kimi K2.6: 262,144 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Kimi K2.6 ≈ $3,900, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning ≈ $260.00.

More comparisons

Kimi K2.6 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeKimi K2.6 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeKimi K2.6 vs Command A+Kimi K2.6 vs GPT-6 Luna ProKimi K2.6 vs GPT-6 LunaKimi K2.6 vs GPT-6 Sol ProKimi K2.6 vs GPT-6 SolKimi K2.6 vs Claude Opus 5.5Kimi K2.6 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedKimi K2.6 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashKimi K2.6 vs Grok 4.7Kimi K2.6 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashKimi K2.6 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXKimi K2.6 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashKimi K2.6 vs GPT-6 AstraKimi K2.6 vs GPT-6 Astra ProNemotron 3.5 Lightning vs GLM 5.3 PrimeNemotron 3.5 Lightning vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeNemotron 3.5 Lightning vs Command A+Nemotron 3.5 Lightning vs GPT-6 Luna ProNemotron 3.5 Lightning vs GPT-6 LunaNemotron 3.5 Lightning vs GPT-6 Sol ProNemotron 3.5 Lightning vs GPT-6 SolNemotron 3.5 Lightning vs Claude Opus 5.5