Kimi K2.6 vs Llama 4 Maverick
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Llama 4 Maverick is 5.6× cheaper than Kimi K2.6 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Llama 4 Maverick has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
| Kimi K2.6 | Llama 4 Maverick | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.95 | $0.19 |
| Output price / 1M | $4.00 | $0.65 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $1.71 | $0.30 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.16 | — |
| Context window | 262K | 1M |
| Max output | 236K | 16K |
| Intelligence index | 27 | — |
| Coding index | 61.8 | 16.3 |
| Providers | 22 | 5 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-04-20 | 2025-04-05 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.6 or Llama 4 Maverick?
Llama 4 Maverick is 5.6× cheaper than Kimi K2.6 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Kimi K2.6 vs Llama 4 Maverick: which has a bigger context window?
Kimi K2.6: 262,144 tokens. Llama 4 Maverick: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Kimi K2.6 ≈ $3,900, Llama 4 Maverick ≈ $701.25.
More comparisons
Kimi K2.6 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeKimi K2.6 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeKimi K2.6 vs Command A+Kimi K2.6 vs GPT-6 Luna ProKimi K2.6 vs GPT-6 LunaKimi K2.6 vs GPT-6 Sol ProKimi K2.6 vs GPT-6 SolKimi K2.6 vs Claude Opus 5.5Kimi K2.6 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedKimi K2.6 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashKimi K2.6 vs Grok 4.7Kimi K2.6 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashKimi K2.6 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXKimi K2.6 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashKimi K2.6 vs GPT-6 AstraKimi K2.6 vs GPT-6 Astra ProLlama 4 Maverick vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLlama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLlama 4 Maverick vs Command A+Llama 4 Maverick vs GPT-6 Luna ProLlama 4 Maverick vs GPT-6 LunaLlama 4 Maverick vs GPT-6 Sol ProLlama 4 Maverick vs GPT-6 SolLlama 4 Maverick vs Claude Opus 5.5