Command A+ vs Llama 4 Maverick
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Llama 4 Maverick is 2.0× cheaper than Command A+ on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Llama 4 Maverick has the larger context window (1M vs 192K).
| Command A+ | Llama 4 Maverick | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.30 | $0.19 |
| Output price / 1M | $1.50 | $0.65 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.60 | $0.30 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.15 | — |
| Context window | 192K | 1M |
| Max output | 64K | 16K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | 16.3 |
| Providers | 1 | 5 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-09-22 | 2025-04-05 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Command A+ or Llama 4 Maverick?
Llama 4 Maverick is 2.0× cheaper than Command A+ on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Command A+ vs Llama 4 Maverick: which has a bigger context window?
Command A+: 192,000 tokens. Llama 4 Maverick: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Command A+ ≈ $1,350, Llama 4 Maverick ≈ $701.25.
More comparisons
Command A+ vs GLM 5.3 PrimeCommand A+ vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeCommand A+ vs GPT-6 Luna ProCommand A+ vs GPT-6 LunaCommand A+ vs GPT-6 Sol ProCommand A+ vs GPT-6 SolCommand A+ vs Claude Opus 5.5Command A+ vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedCommand A+ vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashCommand A+ vs Grok 4.7Command A+ vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashCommand A+ vs GLM 5.3 FlashXCommand A+ vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashCommand A+ vs GPT-6 AstraCommand A+ vs GPT-6 Astra ProCommand A+ vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Llama 4 Maverick vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLlama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLlama 4 Maverick vs GPT-6 Luna ProLlama 4 Maverick vs GPT-6 LunaLlama 4 Maverick vs GPT-6 Sol ProLlama 4 Maverick vs GPT-6 SolLlama 4 Maverick vs Claude Opus 5.5Llama 4 Maverick vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed