Inkling Small vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 3.6× cheaper than Inkling Small on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
| Inkling Small | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.45 | $0.14 |
| Output price / 1M | $1.20 | $0.28 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.64 | $0.18 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.10 | $0.0028 |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | 262K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | 52.9 | — |
| Providers | — | 2 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 99.9% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-07-30 | 2026-09-21 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Inkling Small or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 3.6× cheaper than Inkling Small on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Inkling Small vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: which has a bigger context window?
Inkling Small: 1,048,576 tokens. MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Inkling Small ≈ $1,500, MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00.
More comparisons
Inkling Small vs GLM 5.3 PrimeInkling Small vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeInkling Small vs Command A+Inkling Small vs GPT-6 Luna ProInkling Small vs GPT-6 LunaInkling Small vs GPT-6 Sol ProInkling Small vs GPT-6 SolInkling Small vs Claude Opus 5.5Inkling Small vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedInkling Small vs Grok 4.7Inkling Small vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashInkling Small vs GLM 5.3 FlashXInkling Small vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashInkling Small vs GPT-6 AstraInkling Small vs GPT-6 Astra ProInkling Small vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Command A+MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 LunaMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 SolMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5