Claude Fable 5.2 vs Inkling Small

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Fable 5.2

Anthropic
$8.00 / $40.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Thinkingmachines

Inkling Small

Thinkingmachines
$0.45 / $1.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
Thinkingmachines
Verdict: Inkling Small is 25.1× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Fable 5.2 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (64.6 vs 12.9). Claude Fable 5.2 has the larger context window (1M vs 524K).
Claude Fable 5.2Inkling Small
Input price / 1M$8.00$0.45
Output price / 1M$40.00$1.20
Blended price (3:1)$16.00$0.64
Cached input / 1M$0.20$0.10
Context window1M524K
Max output128K262K
Intelligence index64.612.9
Coding index—52.9
Providers5—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-11-072026-07-30
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.2 or Inkling Small?

Inkling Small is 25.1× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Fable 5.2 vs Inkling Small: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Fable 5.2: 1,000,000 tokens. Inkling Small: 524,288 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Fable 5.2 ≈ $36,000, Inkling Small ≈ $1,500.

More comparisons