Hy3 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 24% cheaper than Hy3 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
| Hy3 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.13 | $0.14 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.53 | $0.28 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.23 | $0.18 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.033 | $0.0028 |
| Context window | 262K | 1M |
| Max output | 128K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | — | 2 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 99.9% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-07-06 | 2026-09-21 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Hy3 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 24% cheaper than Hy3 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Hy3 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: which has a bigger context window?
Hy3: 262,144 tokens. MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Hy3 ≈ $528.00, MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00.
More comparisons
Hy3 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeHy3 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeHy3 vs Command A+Hy3 vs GPT-6 Luna ProHy3 vs GPT-6 LunaHy3 vs GPT-6 Sol ProHy3 vs GPT-6 SolHy3 vs Claude Opus 5.5Hy3 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedHy3 vs Grok 4.7Hy3 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashHy3 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXHy3 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashHy3 vs GPT-6 AstraHy3 vs GPT-6 Astra ProHy3 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Command A+MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 LunaMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 SolMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5