Hy3 preview vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 3.2× cheaper than Hy3 preview on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Hy3 preview scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (25.3 vs 24.6).
| Hy3 preview | Ling 3.0 Flash VL | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.18 | $0.06 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.60 | $0.18 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.29 | $0.09 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.06 | $0.012 |
| Context window | 262K | 262K |
| Max output | 236K | 33K |
| Intelligence index | 25.3 | 24.6 |
| Coding index | 58.8 | 57 |
| Providers | — | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | — |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-04-22 | 2026-09-10 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Hy3 preview or Ling 3.0 Flash VL?
Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 3.2× cheaper than Hy3 preview on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Hy3 preview vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL: which has a bigger context window?
Hy3 preview: 262,144 tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash VL: 262,144 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Hy3 preview ≈ $660.00, Ling 3.0 Flash VL ≈ $210.00.
More comparisons
Hy3 preview vs GLM 5.3 PrimeHy3 preview vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeHy3 preview vs Command A+Hy3 preview vs GPT-6 Luna ProHy3 preview vs GPT-6 LunaHy3 preview vs GPT-6 Sol ProHy3 preview vs GPT-6 SolHy3 preview vs Claude Opus 5.5Hy3 preview vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedHy3 preview vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashHy3 preview vs Grok 4.7Hy3 preview vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashHy3 preview vs GLM 5.3 FlashXHy3 preview vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashHy3 preview vs GPT-6 AstraHy3 preview vs GPT-6 Astra ProLing 3.0 Flash VL vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLing 3.0 Flash VL vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLing 3.0 Flash VL vs Command A+Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs GPT-6 Luna ProLing 3.0 Flash VL vs GPT-6 LunaLing 3.0 Flash VL vs GPT-6 Sol ProLing 3.0 Flash VL vs GPT-6 SolLing 3.0 Flash VL vs Claude Opus 5.5