Hy-MT2-30B-A3B vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Hy-MT2-30B-A3B is 30.9× cheaper than Kimi K3.1 Pro on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Kimi K3.1 Pro has the larger context window (1M vs 8K).
| Hy-MT2-30B-A3B | Kimi K3.1 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.074 | $2.00 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.29 | $10.00 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.13 | $4.00 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.20 |
| Context window | 8K | 1M |
| Max output | 4K | 944K |
| Intelligence index | — | 46.5 |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | — | 23 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | No | Yes |
| Released | 2026-08-20 | 2026-10-23 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Hy-MT2-30B-A3B or Kimi K3.1 Pro?
Hy-MT2-30B-A3B is 30.9× cheaper than Kimi K3.1 Pro on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Hy-MT2-30B-A3B vs Kimi K3.1 Pro: which has a bigger context window?
Hy-MT2-30B-A3B: 8,192 tokens. Kimi K3.1 Pro: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Hy-MT2-30B-A3B ≈ $295.50, Kimi K3.1 Pro ≈ $9,000.
More comparisons
Hy-MT2-30B-A3B vs Gemini 4 CarbonHy-MT2-30B-A3B vs Claude Fable 5.2Hy-MT2-30B-A3B vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashHy-MT2-30B-A3B vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashHy-MT2-30B-A3B vs Hy4Hy-MT2-30B-A3B vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalHy-MT2-30B-A3B vs GPT-6.1 TerraHy-MT2-30B-A3B vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProHy-MT2-30B-A3B vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashHy-MT2-30B-A3B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Hy-MT2-30B-A3B vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLHy-MT2-30B-A3B vs Gemini 4 ArgonHy-MT2-30B-A3B vs Claude Haiku 5.5Hy-MT2-30B-A3B vs Nano Banana 2.1Hy-MT2-30B-A3B vs Mistral Large 4Hy-MT2-30B-A3B vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProKimi K3.1 Pro vs Gemini 4 CarbonKimi K3.1 Pro vs Claude Fable 5.2Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashKimi K3.1 Pro vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashKimi K3.1 Pro vs Hy4Kimi K3.1 Pro vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalKimi K3.1 Pro vs GPT-6.1 TerraKimi K3.1 Pro vs GPT-6.1 Terra Pro