Hy-MT2-30B-A3B vs Hy4
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Hy-MT2-30B-A3B is 4.8× cheaper than Hy4 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Hy4 has the larger context window (1M vs 8K).
| Hy-MT2-30B-A3B | Hy4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.074 | $0.42 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.29 | $1.25 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.13 | $0.63 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.021 |
| Context window | 8K | 1M |
| Max output | 4K | 66K |
| Intelligence index | — | 34.6 |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | — | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | No | Yes |
| Released | 2026-08-20 | 2026-11-04 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Hy-MT2-30B-A3B or Hy4?
Hy-MT2-30B-A3B is 4.8× cheaper than Hy4 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Hy-MT2-30B-A3B vs Hy4: which has a bigger context window?
Hy-MT2-30B-A3B: 8,192 tokens. Hy4: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Hy-MT2-30B-A3B ≈ $295.50, Hy4 ≈ $1,459.
More comparisons
Hy-MT2-30B-A3B vs Gemini 4 CarbonHy-MT2-30B-A3B vs Claude Fable 5.2Hy-MT2-30B-A3B vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashHy-MT2-30B-A3B vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashHy-MT2-30B-A3B vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalHy-MT2-30B-A3B vs GPT-6.1 TerraHy-MT2-30B-A3B vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProHy-MT2-30B-A3B vs Kimi K3.1 ProHy-MT2-30B-A3B vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashHy-MT2-30B-A3B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Hy-MT2-30B-A3B vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLHy-MT2-30B-A3B vs Gemini 4 ArgonHy-MT2-30B-A3B vs Claude Haiku 5.5Hy-MT2-30B-A3B vs Nano Banana 2.1Hy-MT2-30B-A3B vs Mistral Large 4Hy-MT2-30B-A3B vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProHy4 vs Gemini 4 CarbonHy4 vs Claude Fable 5.2Hy4 vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashHy4 vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashHy4 vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalHy4 vs GPT-6.1 TerraHy4 vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProHy4 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro