GPT-6.1 Terra vs Hy-MT2-30B-A3B
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Hy-MT2-30B-A3B is 15.5× cheaper than GPT-6.1 Terra on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GPT-6.1 Terra has the larger context window (1.1M vs 8K).
| GPT-6.1 Terra | Hy-MT2-30B-A3B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $1.00 | $0.074 |
| Output price / 1M | $5.00 | $0.29 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $2.00 | $0.13 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.05 | — |
| Context window | 1.1M | 8K |
| Max output | 128K | 4K |
| Intelligence index | 51.3 | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | 7 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | No |
| Released | 2026-10-26 | 2026-08-20 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GPT-6.1 Terra or Hy-MT2-30B-A3B?
Hy-MT2-30B-A3B is 15.5× cheaper than GPT-6.1 Terra on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GPT-6.1 Terra vs Hy-MT2-30B-A3B: which has a bigger context window?
GPT-6.1 Terra: 1,050,000 tokens. Hy-MT2-30B-A3B: 8,192 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GPT-6.1 Terra ≈ $4,500, Hy-MT2-30B-A3B ≈ $295.50.
More comparisons
GPT-6.1 Terra vs Gemini 4 CarbonGPT-6.1 Terra vs Claude Fable 5.2GPT-6.1 Terra vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashGPT-6.1 Terra vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashGPT-6.1 Terra vs Hy4GPT-6.1 Terra vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalGPT-6.1 Terra vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProGPT-6.1 Terra vs Kimi K3.1 ProGPT-6.1 Terra vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashGPT-6.1 Terra vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GPT-6.1 Terra vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLGPT-6.1 Terra vs Gemini 4 ArgonGPT-6.1 Terra vs Claude Haiku 5.5GPT-6.1 Terra vs Nano Banana 2.1GPT-6.1 Terra vs Mistral Large 4GPT-6.1 Terra vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProHy-MT2-30B-A3B vs Gemini 4 CarbonHy-MT2-30B-A3B vs Claude Fable 5.2Hy-MT2-30B-A3B vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashHy-MT2-30B-A3B vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashHy-MT2-30B-A3B vs Hy4Hy-MT2-30B-A3B vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalHy-MT2-30B-A3B vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProHy-MT2-30B-A3B vs Kimi K3.1 Pro