Hy-MT2-1.8B vs Qwen3.8 27B
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Hy-MT2-1.8B is 13.8× cheaper than Qwen3.8 27B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 27B has the larger context window (1M vs 8K).
| Hy-MT2-1.8B | Qwen3.8 27B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.044 | $0.42 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.18 | $3.00 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.0772 | $1.06 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.085 |
| Context window | 8K | 1M |
| Max output | 4K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | — | 33.7 |
| Coding index | — | 68.1 |
| Providers | 1 | 16 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | No | Yes |
| Released | 2026-08-20 | 2026-08-14 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Hy-MT2-1.8B or Qwen3.8 27B?
Hy-MT2-1.8B is 13.8× cheaper than Qwen3.8 27B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Hy-MT2-1.8B vs Qwen3.8 27B: which has a bigger context window?
Hy-MT2-1.8B: 8,192 tokens. Qwen3.8 27B: 1,000,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Hy-MT2-1.8B ≈ $176.50, Qwen3.8 27B ≈ $2,340.
More comparisons
Hy-MT2-1.8B vs GLM 5.3 PrimeHy-MT2-1.8B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeHy-MT2-1.8B vs Command A+Hy-MT2-1.8B vs GPT-6 Luna ProHy-MT2-1.8B vs GPT-6 LunaHy-MT2-1.8B vs GPT-6 Sol ProHy-MT2-1.8B vs GPT-6 SolHy-MT2-1.8B vs Claude Opus 5.5Hy-MT2-1.8B vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedHy-MT2-1.8B vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashHy-MT2-1.8B vs Grok 4.7Hy-MT2-1.8B vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashHy-MT2-1.8B vs GLM 5.3 FlashXHy-MT2-1.8B vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashHy-MT2-1.8B vs GPT-6 AstraHy-MT2-1.8B vs GPT-6 Astra ProQwen3.8 27B vs GLM 5.3 PrimeQwen3.8 27B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeQwen3.8 27B vs Command A+Qwen3.8 27B vs GPT-6 Luna ProQwen3.8 27B vs GPT-6 LunaQwen3.8 27B vs GPT-6 Sol ProQwen3.8 27B vs GPT-6 SolQwen3.8 27B vs Claude Opus 5.5