Grok 4.5 vs Hy-MT2-1.8B
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Hy-MT2-1.8B is 38.8× cheaper than Grok 4.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Grok 4.5 has the larger context window (500K vs 8K).
| Grok 4.5 | Hy-MT2-1.8B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $2.00 | $0.044 |
| Output price / 1M | $6.00 | $0.18 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $3.00 | $0.0772 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.30 | — |
| Context window | 500K | 8K |
| Max output | 450K | 4K |
| Intelligence index | 38.8 | — |
| Coding index | 72.4 | — |
| Providers | 4 | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Vision input | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | No |
| Released | 2026-07-08 | 2026-08-20 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Grok 4.5 or Hy-MT2-1.8B?
Hy-MT2-1.8B is 38.8× cheaper than Grok 4.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Grok 4.5 vs Hy-MT2-1.8B: which has a bigger context window?
Grok 4.5: 500,000 tokens. Hy-MT2-1.8B: 8,192 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Grok 4.5 ≈ $7,000, Hy-MT2-1.8B ≈ $176.50.
More comparisons
Grok 4.5 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGrok 4.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGrok 4.5 vs Command A+Grok 4.5 vs GPT-6 Luna ProGrok 4.5 vs GPT-6 LunaGrok 4.5 vs GPT-6 Sol ProGrok 4.5 vs GPT-6 SolGrok 4.5 vs Claude Opus 5.5Grok 4.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGrok 4.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGrok 4.5 vs Grok 4.7Grok 4.5 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGrok 4.5 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGrok 4.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGrok 4.5 vs GPT-6 AstraGrok 4.5 vs GPT-6 Astra ProHy-MT2-1.8B vs GLM 5.3 PrimeHy-MT2-1.8B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeHy-MT2-1.8B vs Command A+Hy-MT2-1.8B vs GPT-6 Luna ProHy-MT2-1.8B vs GPT-6 LunaHy-MT2-1.8B vs GPT-6 Sol ProHy-MT2-1.8B vs GPT-6 SolHy-MT2-1.8B vs Claude Opus 5.5