Granite 4.0 Micro vs Ling 3.0 Tiny

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

IBM Granite

Granite 4.0 Micro

IBM Granite
$0.017 / $0.11
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
inclusionAI

Ling 3.0 Tiny

inclusionAI
$0.015 / $0.045
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
IBM Granite
inclusionAI
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Tiny is 45% cheaper than Granite 4.0 Micro on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Ling 3.0 Tiny has the larger context window (262K vs 131K).
Granite 4.0 MicroLing 3.0 Tiny
Input price / 1M$0.017$0.015
Output price / 1M$0.11$0.045
Blended price (3:1)$0.0408$0.0225
Cached input / 1M—$0.003
Context window131K262K
Max output118K250K
Intelligence index5.1—
Coding index—26.5
Providers——
Best provider uptime (30m)——
Vision inputNoNo
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingNoYes
Released2025-10-202026-08-06
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Granite 4.0 Micro or Ling 3.0 Tiny?

Ling 3.0 Tiny is 45% cheaper than Granite 4.0 Micro on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Granite 4.0 Micro vs Ling 3.0 Tiny: which has a bigger context window?

Granite 4.0 Micro: 131,000 tokens. Ling 3.0 Tiny: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Granite 4.0 Micro ≈ $90.00, Ling 3.0 Tiny ≈ $52.50.

More comparisons