GPT-5.6 Luna vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

O

GPT-5.6 Luna

OpenAI
$0.20 / $1.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
I

Ling 3.0 Flash VL

inclusionAI
$0.06 / $0.18
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
O
I
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 5.0× cheaper than GPT-5.6 Luna on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GPT-5.6 Luna scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (37.3 vs 24.6). GPT-5.6 Luna has the larger context window (1.1M vs 262K).
GPT-5.6 LunaLing 3.0 Flash VL
Input price / 1M$0.20$0.06
Output price / 1M$1.20$0.18
Blended price (3:1)$0.45$0.09
Cached input / 1M$0.02$0.012
Context window1.1M262K
Max output128K33K
Intelligence index37.324.6
Coding index71.457
Providers7
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-07-092026-09-10
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.6 Luna or Ling 3.0 Flash VL?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 5.0× cheaper than GPT-5.6 Luna on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GPT-5.6 Luna vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL: which has a bigger context window?

GPT-5.6 Luna: 1,050,000 tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash VL: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GPT-5.6 Luna ≈ $1,000, Ling 3.0 Flash VL ≈ $210.00.

More comparisons