GPT-5 Mini vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

O

GPT-5 Mini

OpenAI
$0.25 / $2.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
I

Ling 3.0 Flash VL

inclusionAI
$0.06 / $0.18
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
O
I
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 7.6× cheaper than GPT-5 Mini on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Ling 3.0 Flash VL scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (24.6 vs 16.8). GPT-5 Mini has the larger context window (400K vs 262K).
GPT-5 MiniLing 3.0 Flash VL
Input price / 1M$0.25$0.06
Output price / 1M$2.00$0.18
Blended price (3:1)$0.69$0.09
Cached input / 1M$0.025$0.012
Context window400K262K
Max output128K33K
Intelligence index16.824.6
Coding index15.657
Providers——
Best provider uptime (30m)——
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2025-08-072026-09-10
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GPT-5 Mini or Ling 3.0 Flash VL?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 7.6× cheaper than GPT-5 Mini on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GPT-5 Mini vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL: which has a bigger context window?

GPT-5 Mini: 400,000 tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash VL: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GPT-5 Mini ≈ $1,500, Ling 3.0 Flash VL ≈ $210.00.

More comparisons

GPT-5 Mini vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGPT-5 Mini vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGPT-5 Mini vs Command A+GPT-5 Mini vs GPT-6 Luna ProGPT-5 Mini vs GPT-6 LunaGPT-5 Mini vs GPT-6 Sol ProGPT-5 Mini vs GPT-6 SolGPT-5 Mini vs Claude Opus 5.5GPT-5 Mini vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGPT-5 Mini vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGPT-5 Mini vs Grok 4.7GPT-5 Mini vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGPT-5 Mini vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGPT-5 Mini vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGPT-5 Mini vs GPT-6 AstraGPT-5 Mini vs GPT-6 Astra ProLing 3.0 Flash VL vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLing 3.0 Flash VL vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLing 3.0 Flash VL vs Command A+Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs GPT-6 Luna ProLing 3.0 Flash VL vs GPT-6 LunaLing 3.0 Flash VL vs GPT-6 Sol ProLing 3.0 Flash VL vs GPT-6 SolLing 3.0 Flash VL vs Claude Opus 5.5