GPT-4o vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 21.9× cheaper than GPT-4o on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety has the larger context window (131K vs 128K).
| GPT-4o | Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $2.50 | $0.20 |
| Output price / 1M | $10.00 | $0.20 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $4.38 | $0.20 |
| Cached input / 1M | $1.25 | — |
| Context window | 128K | 131K |
| Max output | 16K | 118K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | — | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | — |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | No |
| Released | 2024-05-13 | 2026-06-04 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GPT-4o or Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety?
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 21.9× cheaper than GPT-4o on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GPT-4o vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: which has a bigger context window?
GPT-4o: 128,000 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: 131,072 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GPT-4o ≈ $10,000, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety ≈ $500.00.
More comparisons
GPT-4o vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGPT-4o vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGPT-4o vs Command A+GPT-4o vs GPT-6 Luna ProGPT-4o vs GPT-6 LunaGPT-4o vs GPT-6 Sol ProGPT-4o vs GPT-6 SolGPT-4o vs Claude Opus 5.5GPT-4o vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGPT-4o vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGPT-4o vs Grok 4.7GPT-4o vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGPT-4o vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGPT-4o vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGPT-4o vs GPT-6 AstraGPT-4o vs GPT-6 Astra ProNemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs GLM 5.3 PrimeNemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeNemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs Command A+Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs GPT-6 Luna ProNemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs GPT-6 LunaNemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs GPT-6 Sol ProNemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs GPT-6 SolNemotron 3.5 Content Safety vs Claude Opus 5.5