Command A+ vs GPT-4o
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Command A+ is 7.3× cheaper than GPT-4o on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Command A+ has the larger context window (192K vs 128K).
| Command A+ | GPT-4o | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.30 | $2.50 |
| Output price / 1M | $1.50 | $10.00 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.60 | $4.38 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.15 | $1.25 |
| Context window | 192K | 128K |
| Max output | 64K | 16K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | 1 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | — |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-09-22 | 2024-05-13 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Command A+ or GPT-4o?
Command A+ is 7.3× cheaper than GPT-4o on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Command A+ vs GPT-4o: which has a bigger context window?
Command A+: 192,000 tokens. GPT-4o: 128,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Command A+ ≈ $1,350, GPT-4o ≈ $10,000.
More comparisons
Command A+ vs GLM 5.3 PrimeCommand A+ vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeCommand A+ vs GPT-6 Luna ProCommand A+ vs GPT-6 LunaCommand A+ vs GPT-6 Sol ProCommand A+ vs GPT-6 SolCommand A+ vs Claude Opus 5.5Command A+ vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedCommand A+ vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashCommand A+ vs Grok 4.7Command A+ vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashCommand A+ vs GLM 5.3 FlashXCommand A+ vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashCommand A+ vs GPT-6 AstraCommand A+ vs GPT-6 Astra ProCommand A+ vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)GPT-4o vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGPT-4o vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGPT-4o vs GPT-6 Luna ProGPT-4o vs GPT-6 LunaGPT-4o vs GPT-6 Sol ProGPT-4o vs GPT-6 SolGPT-4o vs Claude Opus 5.5GPT-4o vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed