GPT-4.1 Nano vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

O

GPT-4.1 Nano

OpenAI
$0.10 / $0.40
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
X

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Xiaomi
$0.14 / $0.28
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
O
X
Verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 1M).
GPT-4.1 NanoMiMo-V2.6-Flash
Input price / 1M$0.10$0.14
Output price / 1M$0.40$0.28
Blended price (3:1)$0.18$0.18
Cached input / 1M$0.025$0.0028
Context window1M1M
Max output33K131K
Intelligence index——
Coding index11.1—
Providers—2
Best provider uptime (30m)—99.2%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2025-04-142026-09-21
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 Nano or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

GPT-4.1 Nano and MiMo-V2.6-Flash are priced identically.

GPT-4.1 Nano vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: which has a bigger context window?

GPT-4.1 Nano: 1,047,576 tokens. MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GPT-4.1 Nano ≈ $400.00, MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00.

More comparisons

GPT-4.1 Nano vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGPT-4.1 Nano vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGPT-4.1 Nano vs Command A+GPT-4.1 Nano vs GPT-6 Luna ProGPT-4.1 Nano vs GPT-6 LunaGPT-4.1 Nano vs GPT-6 Sol ProGPT-4.1 Nano vs GPT-6 SolGPT-4.1 Nano vs Claude Opus 5.5GPT-4.1 Nano vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGPT-4.1 Nano vs Grok 4.7GPT-4.1 Nano vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGPT-4.1 Nano vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGPT-4.1 Nano vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGPT-4.1 Nano vs GPT-6 AstraGPT-4.1 Nano vs GPT-6 Astra ProGPT-4.1 Nano vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Command A+MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 LunaMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 SolMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5