Command A+ vs GPT-4.1 Nano

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

C

Command A+

Cohere
$0.30 / $1.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
O

GPT-4.1 Nano

OpenAI
$0.10 / $0.40
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
C
O
Verdict: GPT-4.1 Nano is 3.4× cheaper than Command A+ on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GPT-4.1 Nano has the larger context window (1M vs 192K).
Command A+GPT-4.1 Nano
Input price / 1M$0.30$0.10
Output price / 1M$1.50$0.40
Blended price (3:1)$0.60$0.18
Cached input / 1M$0.15$0.025
Context window192K1M
Max output64K33K
Intelligence index——
Coding index—11.1
Providers1—
Best provider uptime (30m)——
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-222025-04-14
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Command A+ or GPT-4.1 Nano?

GPT-4.1 Nano is 3.4× cheaper than Command A+ on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Command A+ vs GPT-4.1 Nano: which has a bigger context window?

Command A+: 192,000 tokens. GPT-4.1 Nano: 1,047,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Command A+ ≈ $1,350, GPT-4.1 Nano ≈ $400.00.

More comparisons

Command A+ vs GLM 5.3 PrimeCommand A+ vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeCommand A+ vs GPT-6 Luna ProCommand A+ vs GPT-6 LunaCommand A+ vs GPT-6 Sol ProCommand A+ vs GPT-6 SolCommand A+ vs Claude Opus 5.5Command A+ vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedCommand A+ vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashCommand A+ vs Grok 4.7Command A+ vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashCommand A+ vs GLM 5.3 FlashXCommand A+ vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashCommand A+ vs GPT-6 AstraCommand A+ vs GPT-6 Astra ProCommand A+ vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)GPT-4.1 Nano vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGPT-4.1 Nano vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGPT-4.1 Nano vs GPT-6 Luna ProGPT-4.1 Nano vs GPT-6 LunaGPT-4.1 Nano vs GPT-6 Sol ProGPT-4.1 Nano vs GPT-6 SolGPT-4.1 Nano vs Claude Opus 5.5GPT-4.1 Nano vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed