GPT-4.1 Nano vs Grok 4.7
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: GPT-4.1 Nano is 13.7× cheaper than Grok 4.7 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GPT-4.1 Nano has the larger context window (1M vs 500K).
| GPT-4.1 Nano | Grok 4.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.10 | $1.60 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.40 | $4.80 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.18 | $2.40 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.025 | $0.40 |
| Context window | 1M | 500K |
| Max output | 33K | 450K |
| Intelligence index | — | 46.4 |
| Coding index | 11.1 | — |
| Providers | — | 4 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 99.9% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2025-04-14 | 2026-09-21 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 Nano or Grok 4.7?
GPT-4.1 Nano is 13.7× cheaper than Grok 4.7 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GPT-4.1 Nano vs Grok 4.7: which has a bigger context window?
GPT-4.1 Nano: 1,047,576 tokens. Grok 4.7: 500,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GPT-4.1 Nano ≈ $400.00, Grok 4.7 ≈ $5,600.
More comparisons
GPT-4.1 Nano vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGPT-4.1 Nano vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGPT-4.1 Nano vs Command A+GPT-4.1 Nano vs GPT-6 Luna ProGPT-4.1 Nano vs GPT-6 LunaGPT-4.1 Nano vs GPT-6 Sol ProGPT-4.1 Nano vs GPT-6 SolGPT-4.1 Nano vs Claude Opus 5.5GPT-4.1 Nano vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGPT-4.1 Nano vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGPT-4.1 Nano vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGPT-4.1 Nano vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGPT-4.1 Nano vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGPT-4.1 Nano vs GPT-6 AstraGPT-4.1 Nano vs GPT-6 Astra ProGPT-4.1 Nano vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Grok 4.7 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGrok 4.7 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGrok 4.7 vs Command A+Grok 4.7 vs GPT-6 Luna ProGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 LunaGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 Sol ProGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 SolGrok 4.7 vs Claude Opus 5.5