GPT-4.1 Nano vs Llama 4 Scout

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

O

GPT-4.1 Nano

OpenAI
$0.10 / $0.40
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
M

Llama 4 Scout

Meta Llama
$0.10 / $0.30
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
O
M
Verdict: Llama 4 Scout is 14% cheaper than GPT-4.1 Nano on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window (1.3M vs 1M).
GPT-4.1 NanoLlama 4 Scout
Input price / 1M$0.10$0.10
Output price / 1M$0.40$0.30
Blended price (3:1)$0.18$0.15
Cached input / 1M$0.025—
Context window1M1.3M
Max output33K16K
Intelligence index——
Coding index11.18.2
Providers—3
Best provider uptime (30m)—99.9%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningNoNo
Tool callingYesYes
Released2025-04-142025-04-05
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 Nano or Llama 4 Scout?

Llama 4 Scout is 14% cheaper than GPT-4.1 Nano on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GPT-4.1 Nano vs Llama 4 Scout: which has a bigger context window?

GPT-4.1 Nano: 1,047,576 tokens. Llama 4 Scout: 1,310,720 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GPT-4.1 Nano ≈ $400.00, Llama 4 Scout ≈ $350.00.

More comparisons

GPT-4.1 Nano vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGPT-4.1 Nano vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGPT-4.1 Nano vs Command A+GPT-4.1 Nano vs GPT-6 Luna ProGPT-4.1 Nano vs GPT-6 LunaGPT-4.1 Nano vs GPT-6 Sol ProGPT-4.1 Nano vs GPT-6 SolGPT-4.1 Nano vs Claude Opus 5.5GPT-4.1 Nano vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGPT-4.1 Nano vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGPT-4.1 Nano vs Grok 4.7GPT-4.1 Nano vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGPT-4.1 Nano vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGPT-4.1 Nano vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGPT-4.1 Nano vs GPT-6 AstraGPT-4.1 Nano vs GPT-6 Astra ProLlama 4 Scout vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLlama 4 Scout vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLlama 4 Scout vs Command A+Llama 4 Scout vs GPT-6 Luna ProLlama 4 Scout vs GPT-6 LunaLlama 4 Scout vs GPT-6 Sol ProLlama 4 Scout vs GPT-6 SolLlama 4 Scout vs Claude Opus 5.5