GPT-4 vs Hy-MT2-1.8B
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Hy-MT2-1.8B is 485.4× cheaper than GPT-4 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Hy-MT2-1.8B has the larger context window (8K vs 8K).
| GPT-4 | Hy-MT2-1.8B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $30.00 | $0.044 |
| Output price / 1M | $60.00 | $0.18 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $37.50 | $0.0772 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | — |
| Context window | 8K | 8K |
| Max output | 4K | 4K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | 13.1 | — |
| Providers | — | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | No |
| Released | 2023-05-28 | 2026-08-20 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GPT-4 or Hy-MT2-1.8B?
Hy-MT2-1.8B is 485.4× cheaper than GPT-4 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GPT-4 vs Hy-MT2-1.8B: which has a bigger context window?
GPT-4: 8,191 tokens. Hy-MT2-1.8B: 8,192 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GPT-4 ≈ $90,000, Hy-MT2-1.8B ≈ $176.50.
More comparisons
GPT-4 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGPT-4 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGPT-4 vs Command A+GPT-4 vs GPT-6 Luna ProGPT-4 vs GPT-6 LunaGPT-4 vs GPT-6 Sol ProGPT-4 vs GPT-6 SolGPT-4 vs Claude Opus 5.5GPT-4 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGPT-4 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGPT-4 vs Grok 4.7GPT-4 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGPT-4 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGPT-4 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGPT-4 vs GPT-6 AstraGPT-4 vs GPT-6 Astra ProHy-MT2-1.8B vs GLM 5.3 PrimeHy-MT2-1.8B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeHy-MT2-1.8B vs Command A+Hy-MT2-1.8B vs GPT-6 Luna ProHy-MT2-1.8B vs GPT-6 LunaHy-MT2-1.8B vs GPT-6 Sol ProHy-MT2-1.8B vs GPT-6 SolHy-MT2-1.8B vs Claude Opus 5.5