GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Ling 3.0 Tiny
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Tiny is 33.3× cheaper than GPT-3.5 Turbo on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Ling 3.0 Tiny has the larger context window (262K vs 16K).
| GPT-3.5 Turbo | Ling 3.0 Tiny | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.50 | $0.015 |
| Output price / 1M | $1.50 | $0.045 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.75 | $0.0225 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.003 |
| Context window | 16K | 262K |
| Max output | 4K | 250K |
| Intelligence index | 5.5 | — |
| Coding index | 10.7 | 26.5 |
| Providers | — | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | — |
| Vision input | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2023-05-28 | 2026-08-06 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GPT-3.5 Turbo or Ling 3.0 Tiny?
Ling 3.0 Tiny is 33.3× cheaper than GPT-3.5 Turbo on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Ling 3.0 Tiny: which has a bigger context window?
GPT-3.5 Turbo: 16,385 tokens. Ling 3.0 Tiny: 262,144 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GPT-3.5 Turbo ≈ $1,750, Ling 3.0 Tiny ≈ $52.50.
More comparisons
GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Gemini 4 CarbonGPT-3.5 Turbo vs Claude Fable 5.2GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashGPT-3.5 Turbo vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashGPT-3.5 Turbo vs Hy4GPT-3.5 Turbo vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalGPT-3.5 Turbo vs GPT-6.1 TerraGPT-3.5 Turbo vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProGPT-3.5 Turbo vs Kimi K3.1 ProGPT-3.5 Turbo vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashGPT-3.5 Turbo vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLGPT-3.5 Turbo vs Gemini 4 ArgonGPT-3.5 Turbo vs Claude Haiku 5.5GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Nano Banana 2.1GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Mistral Large 4Ling 3.0 Tiny vs Gemini 4 CarbonLing 3.0 Tiny vs Claude Fable 5.2Ling 3.0 Tiny vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashLing 3.0 Tiny vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashLing 3.0 Tiny vs Hy4Ling 3.0 Tiny vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalLing 3.0 Tiny vs GPT-6.1 TerraLing 3.0 Tiny vs GPT-6.1 Terra Pro