GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Z.ai (Zhipu)

GLM 5.3 FlashX

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.37 / $1.25
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.21 / $1.90
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Z.ai (Zhipu)
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: GLM 5.3 FlashX is 7% cheaper than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 FlashX has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
GLM 5.3 FlashXQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Input price / 1M$0.37$0.21
Output price / 1M$1.25$1.90
Blended price (3:1)$0.59$0.63
Cached input / 1M$0.09$0.10
Context window1M262K
Max output131K33K
Intelligence index
Coding index
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-182025-09-23
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 FlashX or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

GLM 5.3 FlashX is 7% cheaper than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct: which has a bigger context window?

GLM 5.3 FlashX: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 FlashX ≈ $1,365, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct ≈ $1,370.

More comparisons